Religious diversity accomodation for social cohesion: gaps in the legal protection of religious diversity: generic versus specific protection instruments
| dc.contributor.author | Ruiz Vieytez, Eduardo Javier | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-07-23T10:03:45Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-07-23T10:03:45Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
| dc.date.updated | 2026-07-23T10:03:45Z | |
| dc.description.abstract | La protección jurídica de la diversidad religiosa en sociedades plurales se vertebra principalmente sobre el derecho humano a la libertad de religión y creencias, ampliamente reconocido en el marco del Derecho internacional de los derechos humanos. Sin embargo, las interpretaciones de este derecho distan de ser unívocas cuando se trata de gestionar la situación de personas cuyas creencias religiosas son minoritarias. Las llamadas prácticas de armonización constituyen técnicas destinadas a pluralizar el contenido y el ejercicio de este derecho. Paralelamente, el denominado Derecho de las minorías (en su caso, religiosas) ofrece también un marco de protección cuyo alcance no ha sido aún nítidamente definido. La pluralidad actual de las sociedades europeas y su compromiso de proteger la diversidad y a las minorías obligan a buscar un marco más certero y eficaz de protección, optando entre derechos e instrumentos genéricos o específicos. | es |
| dc.description.abstract | The legal protection of religious diversity in plural societies is mainly supported by the human right to freedom of religion and belief, which is widely recognized under the international human rights law. However, interpretations of this law are far from univocal when it comes to managing the situation of persons whose religious beliefs are a minority. The so-called harmonisation practices are techniques to spread the content and exercise of this right. Similarly, the so-called Rights of minorities (as is the case of religious ones) also provide a protection framework, the scope of which has not yet been clearly defined. The current diversity of European societies and their commitment to protect the diversity and minorities lead us to seek a more focused and effective framework of protection, choosing between rights and generic or specific instruments. | en |
| dc.identifier.citation | Ruiz Vieytez, E. J. (2011). Religious diversity: accomodation for social cohesion: gaps in the legal protection of religious diversity: generic versus specific protection instruments. Anuario de acción humanitaria y derechos humanos = Yearbook of humanitarian action and human rights, 8, 13-26. https://doi.org/10.18543/aahdh-8-2011pp13-26 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.18543/aahdh-8-2011pp13-26 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1885-298X | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14454/6424 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.publisher | Universidad de Deusto = Deustuko Unibertsitatea, Instituto de Derechos Humanos Pedro Arrupe | |
| dc.rights | © Universidad de Deusto | |
| dc.subject.other | Religious diversity | |
| dc.subject.other | Harmonisation practices | |
| dc.subject.other | Minorities | |
| dc.subject.other | Social cohesion | |
| dc.subject.other | Diversidad religiosa | |
| dc.subject.other | Prácticas de armonización | |
| dc.subject.other | Minorías | |
| dc.subject.other | Cohesión social | |
| dc.title | Religious diversity accomodation for social cohesion: gaps in the legal protection of religious diversity: generic versus specific protection instruments | en |
| dc.type | journal article | |
| dcterms.accessRights | open access | |
| oaire.citation.endPage | 26 | |
| oaire.citation.startPage | 13 | |
| oaire.citation.title | Anuario de acción humanitaria y derechos humanos = Yearbook of humanitarian action and human rights | |
| oaire.citation.volume | 8 | |
| oaire.licenseCondition | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ | |
| oaire.version | VoR |
Archivos
Bloque original
1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
- Nombre:
- ruiz_religious_2011.pdf
- Tamaño:
- 180.29 KB
- Formato:
- Adobe Portable Document Format