Conventional wisdom, meta-analysis, and research revision in economics
dc.contributor.author | Gechert, Sebastian | |
dc.contributor.author | Mey, Bianka | |
dc.contributor.author | Opatrny, Matej | |
dc.contributor.author | Havránek, Tomáš | |
dc.contributor.author | Stanley, T. D. | |
dc.contributor.author | Bom, Pedro | |
dc.contributor.author | Doucouliagos, Hristos | |
dc.contributor.author | Heimberger, Philipp | |
dc.contributor.author | Irsova, Zuzana | |
dc.contributor.author | Rachinger, Heiko | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-09-04T10:45:48Z | |
dc.date.available | 2025-09-04T10:45:48Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2025-05-20 | |
dc.date.updated | 2025-09-04T10:45:48Z | |
dc.description.abstract | Over the past several decades, meta-analysis has emerged as a widely accepted tool to understand economics research. Meta-analyses often challenge the established conventional wisdom of their respective fields. We systematically review a wide range of influential meta-analyses in economics and compare them to “conventional wisdom.” After correcting for observable biases, the empirical economic effects are typically much closer to zero and sometimes switch signs. Typically, the relative reduction in effect sizes is 45%–60%. | en |
dc.description.sponsorship | Gechert, Heimberger and Mey acknowledge financial support by the European Macro Policy Network (EMPN); Havranek acknowledges support from the Czech Science Foundation (#24-11583S). Bom, Irsova and Rachinger acknowledge support from the Czech Science Foundation (#23-05227M) Havranek and Irsova acknowledge support from NPO “Systemic Risk Institute” LX22NPO5101, funded by the European Union-Next Generation EU (Czech Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports, NPO: EXCELES) | en |
dc.identifier.citation | Gechert, S., Mey, B., Opatrny, M., Havranek, T., Stanley, Bom, P. R. D., Doucouliagos, H., Heimberger, P., Irsova, Z., & Rachinger, H. J. (2025). Conventional wisdom, meta-analysis, and research revision in economics. Journal of Economic Surveys, 39(3), 980-999. https://doi.org/10.1111/JOES.12630 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/JOES.12630 | |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1467-6419 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0950-0804 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14454/3501 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc | |
dc.rights | © 2024 The Authors | |
dc.subject.other | Conventional wisdom | |
dc.subject.other | Meta-analysis | |
dc.subject.other | Systematic review | |
dc.title | Conventional wisdom, meta-analysis, and research revision in economics | en |
dc.type | journal article | |
dcterms.accessRights | open access | |
oaire.citation.endPage | 999 | |
oaire.citation.issue | 3 | |
oaire.citation.startPage | 980 | |
oaire.citation.title | Journal of Economic Surveys | |
oaire.citation.volume | 39 | |
oaire.licenseCondition | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | |
oaire.version | VoR |
Archivos
Bloque original
1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
- Nombre:
- gechert_conventional_2024.pdf
- Tamaño:
- 365.83 KB
- Formato:
- Adobe Portable Document Format