The reform of the Dublin III regulation: how to build or not to build further enforcing mechanisms
Cargando...
Fecha
2019-12-31
Autores
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Universidad de Málaga (UMA), Área de Derecho Internacional Público y Relaciones Internacionales
Asociación Española de Profesores de Derecho Internacional y Relaciones Internacionales
Tirant lo Blanch
Asociación Española de Profesores de Derecho Internacional y Relaciones Internacionales
Tirant lo Blanch
Resumen
The European Commission’s proposal for the reform of the Common European Asylum System was presented in 2016 as a package deal. Of all the contentious legal instruments to be reformed, the most complex is the proposal for the Dublin IV Regulation. This article particularly seeks to identify the changes that illustrate the reactions of the European Commission and the Parliament as regards the mechanisms to enforce the Dublin system. On the one hand, some of the measures mark a shift from the human rights concept of refugee protection to an emphasis on security and punitive measures. On the other hand, it contends that some provisions of the Dublin IV proposal provide minimal persuading effects for States and asylum seekers. The robust conditions imposed on the ‘beneficiaries’ erode whatever the system is supposed to provide, either compliance with human rights standards or its proper implementation.
Palabras clave
Common European Asylum System
Dublin III Regulation
Secondary movements
CEAS reform
Dublin III Regulation
Secondary movements
CEAS reform
Descripción
Materias
Cita
Abrisketa Uriarte, J. (2019). The reform of the Dublin III regulation: how to build or not to build further enforcing mechanisms. SYbIL: Spanish yearbook of international law, 23, 263-272.