Speedy trial in election crimes in Indonesia: between judicial efficiency and evidentiary integrity

Miniatura
Archivos
mayasari_speedy_2025.pdf (662.73 KB)
Fecha
2025-11-08
Autores
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Universitas Negeri Semarang
google-scholar
Resumen
Speedy trials in regional election criminal cases are essential for maintaining democratic integrity, but they raise concerns about balancing efficiency with substantive justice. This study examines the implications of implementing speedy trial principles on evidence quality, access to justice, human rights protection, and judicial system integrity through normative legal analysis of primary sources. The research reveals that accelerated judicial processes create tensions between procedural speed and thoroughness, potentially compromising the examination of evidence, disadvantaging resource-limited defendants, and risking due process violations. The findings demonstrate that expedited timelines may undermine comprehensive legal reasoning in judicial decisions. A balanced framework is essential to achieve both procedural efficiency and substantive justice in electoral criminal proceedings.
Palabras clave
Election Crime
Evidence
Justice
Speedy Trial
Descripción
Materias
Cita
Mayasari, R. E., Sakti, L. O. A., Jannah, S. H. M., Yahyanto, & Cellis, E. A. (2025). Speedy Trial in Election Crimes in Indonesia: Between Judicial Efficiency and Evidentiary Integrity. Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies, 10(2), 953-984. https://doi.org/10.15294/IJCLS.V10I2.29811
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14454/5720
Colecciones
Artículos