A comparative study between scanning devices for 3D printing of personalized ostomy patches

dc.contributor.authorZahia, Sofia
dc.contributor.authorGarcía-Zapirain, Begoña
dc.contributor.authorAnakabe, Jon
dc.contributor.authorPáez Orue-Echevarría, Joan Ander
dc.contributor.authorBastidas-Jossa, Óscar
dc.contributor.authorLoizate Totoricagüena, Alberto
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-17T11:03:44Z
dc.date.available2025-06-17T11:03:44Z
dc.date.issued2022-01-12
dc.date.updated2025-06-17T11:03:44Z
dc.description.abstractThis papers presents a comparative study of three different 3D scanning modalities to acquire 3D meshes of stoma barrier rings from ostomized patients. Computerized Tomography and Structured light scanning methods were the digitization technologies studied in this research. Among the Structured Light systems, the Go!Scan 20 and the Structure Sensor were chosen as the handheld 3D scanners. Nineteen ostomized patients took part in this study, starting from the 3D scans acquisition until the printed ostomy patches validation. 3D mesh processing, mesh generation and 3D mesh comparison was carried out using commercial softwares. The results of the presented study show that the Structure Sensor, which is the low cost structured light 3D sensor, has a great potential for such applications. This study also discusses the benefits and reliability of low-cost structured light systems.en
dc.description.sponsorshipDepartment of Economic Development, Sustainability and Environment of the Basque Government, Spain, through grant INTELOST project (KK-2019/00013) of the Elkartek Program, to support collaborative research in strategic areasen
dc.identifier.citationZahia, S., Garcia-Zapirain, B., Anakabe, J., Páez, J., Bastidas, O. J., & Loizate, A. L. (2022). A comparative study between scanning devices for 3D printing of personalized ostomy patches. Sensors, 22(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/S22020560
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/S22020560
dc.identifier.issn1424-8220
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14454/3078
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherMDPI
dc.rights© 2022 by the authors
dc.subject.other3D scanners
dc.subject.otherAdditive manufacturing
dc.subject.otherMedical devices
dc.subject.otherOstomy
dc.titleA comparative study between scanning devices for 3D printing of personalized ostomy patchesen
dc.typejournal article
dcterms.accessRightsopen access
oaire.citation.issue2
oaire.citation.titleSensors
oaire.citation.volume22
oaire.licenseConditionhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
oaire.versionVoR
Archivos
Bloque original
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
zahia_comparative_2022.pdf
Tamaño:
8.26 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Colecciones