Assessor versus assessee: a scoping review of the impact of peer assessment roles on cognitive, intrapersonal, and interpersonal outcomes

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.authorZamorano Sande, David
dc.contributor.authorAlqassab, Maryam
dc.contributor.authorPanadero, Ernesto
dc.date.accessioned2026-08-13T06:22:39Z
dc.date.available2026-08-13T06:22:39Z
dc.date.issued2026-06-23
dc.date.updated2026-08-13T06:22:39Z
dc.description.abstractPeer assessment can shape students' learning across cognitive, intrapersonal, and interpersonal outcomes. When students participate in peer assessment, they can take on two distinct roles, as assessors or as assessees, each of which may shape their learning differently. However, only recently, there has been interest in comparing how each role contributes to students' learning. This comparison comes with a challenge: students usually play both roles reciprocally, making it difficult to disentangle the effect of each. We conducted a scoping review to examine the methodological approaches, and the evidence generated from peer assessment studies comparing the effects of the assessor and assessee roles on cognitive, intrapersonal, and interpersonal learning outcomes. Our review identified 19 studies, most conducted in higher education contexts. They compared the differential impact on cognitive (n = 9), intrapersonal (n = 9), and interpersonal (n = 1) outcomes. Among the studies focusing on cognitive outcomes, a subset used designs that specifically isolated each role, yet even these produced inconsistent results: in some studies students acting as assessors outperformed assessees, while in others both roles led to similar gains. In contrast, research focusing on intrapersonal and interpersonal outcomes is largely exploratory, though it offers a useful foundation for developing more focused designs aimed at specific variables. We propose a set of guidelines for future research aimed at systematically disentangling the impact of the assessor and assessee roles on the three aforementioned outcomes.en
dc.description.sponsorshipThis project was funded by: Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad) National I+D Call (Convocatoria Excelencia) project reference PID2019-108982GB-I00; personal grant (Formación de Personal Investigador) reference PRE2020-092280; and Basque Government Call for Grants to support the activities of research groups of the Basque University System (2022-2025) project reference IT1624-22en
dc.identifier.citationZamorano, D., Alqassab, M., & Panadero, E. (2026). Assessor versus assessee: a scoping review of the impact of peer assessment roles on cognitive, intrapersonal, and interpersonal outcomes. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 41(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/S10212-026-01148-4
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/S10212-026-01148-4
dc.identifier.eissn1878-5174
dc.identifier.issn0256-2928
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14454/6495
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media B.V.
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2026
dc.subject.otherAssessee
dc.subject.otherAssessor
dc.subject.otherCognitive outcomes
dc.subject.otherInterpersonal outcomes
dc.subject.otherIntrapersonal outcomes
dc.subject.otherPeer assessment
dc.subject.otherRoles
dc.subject.otherScoping review
dc.titleAssessor versus assessee: a scoping review of the impact of peer assessment roles on cognitive, intrapersonal, and interpersonal outcomesen
dc.typejournal article
dcterms.accessRightsopen access
oaire.citation.issue3
oaire.citation.titleEuropean Journal of Psychology of Education
oaire.citation.volume41
oaire.licenseConditionhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
oaire.versionVoR
Archivos
Bloque original
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
zamorano_assessor_2026.pdf
Tamaño:
1.03 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descargar
Colecciones
Artículos