Patterns of change in the justifiability of euthanasia across OECD countries

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.authorTormos, Raül
dc.contributor.authorRudnev, Maksim
dc.contributor.authorBartolomé Peral, Edurne
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-21T16:52:40Z
dc.date.available2025-05-21T16:52:40Z
dc.date.issued2023-06-16
dc.date.updated2025-05-21T16:52:40Z
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The public's justifiability of euthanasia has increased as more countries have adopted laws permitting a range of end-of-life practices. Despite this trend, there is a dearth of longitudinal and comparative studies investigating attitudes toward euthanasia. Consequently, it remains unclear whether this rise in justifiability is a period-specific trend or generational change. Methods: We analyzed data from the European and World Values Survey from 1981 to 2021 to examine period variations, between-cohort differences, and within-cohort changes across 35 affluent countries. This analysis was conducted using dynamic comparative multilevel regression and a comparative version of the cross-classified random effects regressions. Results: Our descriptive results supported our hypotheses, indicating an increase in euthanasia's justifiability in virtually all surveyed countries, with both overall and within-cohort changes gravitating toward higher degrees of justifiability. Furthermore, newer periods and younger cohorts were found to be more permissive than their older counterparts. These consistent increases in the justifiability of euthanasia were verified by the multilevel models. Discussion: Our results were in line with modernization theory, observing a gradual change in attitudes between cohorts due to generational replacement. However, we also identified intra-cohort changes related to the processes of human development across various countries. Some robustness checks produced ambiguous results in distinguishing period and cohort effects, yet the combination of these components aligns with substantive theory. Conclusion: Our findings indicate a more complex pattern of change than predicted by the impressionable years model, a leading approach in political socialization research. This study contributes significantly to our understanding of evolving attitudes toward euthanasia, bridging the gap in longitudinal and comparative studies on the subject.en
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation under Grant PID2019-106882RB-I00 and by the DFG-German Research Foundation under Grant BE 4267/2-1, and under the grant for mobility of PhD staff by the Basque Government (2022)en
dc.identifier.citationTormos, R., Rudnev, M., & Bartolomé Peral, E. (2023). Patterns of change in the justifiability of euthanasia across OECD countries. Frontiers in Political Science, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPOS.2023.1036447
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/FPOS.2023.1036447
dc.identifier.eissn2673-3145
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14454/2809
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherFrontiers Media SA
dc.rights© 2023 Tormos, Rudnev and Bartolomé Peral
dc.subject.otherAge-period-cohort analysis
dc.subject.otherEuthanasia
dc.subject.otherModernization
dc.subject.otherSocialization
dc.subject.otherValues
dc.titlePatterns of change in the justifiability of euthanasia across OECD countriesen
dc.typejournal article
dcterms.accessRightsopen access
oaire.citation.titleFrontiers in Political Science
oaire.citation.volume5
oaire.licenseConditionhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
oaire.versionVoR
Archivos
Bloque original
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
tormos_patterns_2023.pdf
Tamaño:
2.6 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descargar
Colecciones
Artículos