Agreement and reliability between tele-assessment and in-person assessment of the one-minute sit-to-stand test in patients with chronic respiratory diseases

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.authorLarrateguy, Santiago
dc.contributor.authorOtto-Yáñez, Matías
dc.contributor.authorBogado, Juan
dc.contributor.authorLarrateguy, Luis
dc.contributor.authorBarros Poblete, Marisol
dc.contributor.authorMazzucco, Guillermo
dc.contributor.authorBlanco Vich, Isabel
dc.contributor.authorGimeno Santos, Elena
dc.contributor.authorTorres Castro, Rodrigo
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-31T11:30:05Z
dc.date.available2025-10-31T11:30:05Z
dc.date.issued2025-07-16
dc.date.updated2025-10-31T11:30:05Z
dc.description.abstractBackground/Objectives: Telemedicine has emerged as a valuable tool for overcoming access barriers in healthcare, particularly in rehabilitation. However, the validity and reliability of remotely conducted physical capacity assessments remain unclear. This study evaluated the agreement and intra-rater reliability between in-person and tele-assessment administration of the one-minute sit-to-stand test (1 min-STST) in individuals with chronic respiratory diseases (CRDs). Methods: In this cross-sectional study, forty adults (55% female; mean age 59.8 ± 15.9 years) diagnosed with CRDs—including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (52.5%), asthma (20%), and pulmonary fibrosis (20%)—completed the 1 min-STST in two conditions: in person and via tele-assessment. The primary outcome was the number of repetitions completed in each condition. Intra-rater reliability was analyzed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and agreement between methods was evaluated with Bland–Altman analysis. Results: The mean number of repetitions was 24.4 ± 8.0 in person and 24.3 ± 8.1 via tele-assessment, with no significant difference (p = 0.78). Excellent reliability was observed (ICC = 0.978, p < 0.001), and Bland–Altman analysis showed good agreement with a mean difference of 0.08 ± 1.7 repetitions and limits of agreement from −3.26 to 3.41. No adverse events were reported. Conclusions: Tele-assessment of the 1 min-STST shows excellent agreement and reliability compared to in-person assessment in individuals with CRDs. These findings support tele-assessment as a valid and practical alternative for evaluating functional capacity remotely. Further research is needed to confirm its implementation in home-based or less-controlled settings.en
dc.identifier.citationLarrateguy, S., Otto-Yáñez, M., Bogado, J., Larrateguy, L., Barros-Poblete, M., Mazzucco, G., Blanco, I., Gimeno-Santos, E., & Torres-Castro, R. (2025). Agreement and reliability between tele-assessment and in-person assessment of the one-minute sit-to-stand test in patients with chronic respiratory diseases. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 14(14). https://doi.org/10.3390/JCM14145049
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/JCM14145049
dc.identifier.eissn2077-0383
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14454/4185
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)
dc.rights© 2025 by the authors
dc.subject.otherField tests
dc.subject.otherPhysical capacity
dc.subject.otherPulmonary rehabilitation
dc.subject.otherSit-to-stand test
dc.subject.otherTele-assessment
dc.titleAgreement and reliability between tele-assessment and in-person assessment of the one-minute sit-to-stand test in patients with chronic respiratory diseasesen
dc.typejournal article
dcterms.accessRightsopen access
oaire.citation.issue14
oaire.citation.titleJournal of Clinical Medicine
oaire.citation.volume14
oaire.licenseConditionhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
oaire.versionVoR
Archivos
Bloque original
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
larrateguy_agreement_2025.pdf
Tamaño:
488.54 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descargar
Colecciones
Artículos