A meta-analytical review of the effects of self-assessment and peer-assessment interventions on self-regulated learning strategies and affective outcomes
Archivos
Fecha
2026-06-07
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Routledge
Resumen
Self-assessment (SA) and peer-assessment (PA) are increasingly studied for their effects on learning strategies and affective outcomes. This review examined the effect of SA and PA on eight groups of outcome variables: four self-regulated learning strategies (general regulatory strategies, (meta)cognitive strategies, regulation of motivation, regulation of the resources and the environment) and four affective outcomes (attitude, emotion, motivation, and self-efficacy). The analysis included 353 effect sizes from 75 peer-reviewed studies involving K-12 to higher education students, using experimental or quasi-experimental designs. Three-level model analyses showed that SA and PA had positive effects on desirable learning strategies and affective outcomes (Hedges’ g = 0.205 to 0.683). Comparatively, SA interventions demonstrate a larger mean effect size on motivation than PA. Additionally, four significant moderators were identified. Overall, the findings provide preliminary evidence that SA and PA support student learning beyond academic performance, with effect strength varying by outcome category and study quality.
Palabras clave
Affective outcome
Learning strategy
Meta-analysis
Peer-assessment
Self-assessment
Learning strategy
Meta-analysis
Peer-assessment
Self-assessment
Descripción
Materias
Cita
Yan, Z., Lao, H., Panadero, E., & Fernández-Castilla, B. (2026). A meta-analytical review of the effects of self-assessment and peer-assessment interventions on self-regulated learning strategies and affective outcomes . Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 33(3), 209-247. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2026.2681630