How rubric performance-level order and feedback shape students’ real-time self-regulation and self-efficacy

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.authorPanadero, Ernesto
dc.contributor.authorPinedo Castillo, Leire
dc.contributor.authorFernández Ortube, Alazne
dc.contributor.authorZamorano Sande, David
dc.contributor.authorBarrenetxea Mínguez, Lucía
dc.contributor.authorSánchez Iglesias, Iván
dc.date.accessioned2026-08-03T10:39:26Z
dc.date.available2026-08-03T10:39:26Z
dc.date.issued2026-05-30
dc.date.updated2026-08-03T10:39:26Z
dc.description.abstractThis study examines how the order of rubric performance levels (high-to-low vs. low-to-high) and four types of feedback (no feedback, rubric-based, product, and process) influence university students’ self-regulated learning (SRL) and self-efficacy during an academic task. A total of 120 first-year students completed two landscape analysis tasks supported by rubrics while verbalizing their thoughts through think-aloud protocols. Self-efficacy was measured before and after the experimental session. Students predominantly produced positive self-regulatory actions across the five task phases, displaying a W-shaped pattern that reflected shifts in task demands: higher regulatory engagement during rubric reading and written analysis, and lower engagement during oral description phases. Negative actions were less frequent and concentrated in the initial rubric reading and first written analysis. Neither performance-level order nor feedback type significantly affected positive or negative SRL actions; the only significant within-subjects factor was task phase. Self-efficacy decreased across all conditions, suggesting a recalibration of confidence in response to task demands and rubric criteria. These findings indicate that moment-to-moment SRL engagement is primarily shaped by the nature of the task phase rather than by the specific scaffolding configuration, and underscore the importance of process-oriented methods for capturing dynamic regulatory patterns in rubric-supported learning environments.en
dc.description.sponsorshipOpen Access funding provided thanks to the CRUE-CSIC agreement with Springer Nature. (1) Spanish National R+D call from the Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades (Generación del conocimiento 2020), Reference number: PID2019-108982GB-I00. (2) Basque Government Call for Grants to support the activities of research groups of the Basque University System (2022-2025) project reference IT1624-22. (3) Basque Country Equipment 2021 call. Project: Eye tracker. Reference: EC21_2021_1_0004. (4) Spanish National R+D call from the Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades (Generación del conocimiento 2020), Reference number: PID2024-156609NB-I00en
dc.identifier.citationPanadero, E., Pinedo, L., Fernández-Ortube, A., Zamorano, D., Barrenetxea-Minguez, L., & Sánchez-Iglesias, I. (2026). How rubric performance-level order and feedback shape students’ real-time self-regulation and self-efficacy. Metacognition and Learning, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/S11409-026-09468-Y
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/S11409-026-09468-Y
dc.identifier.eissn1556-1631
dc.identifier.issn1556-1623
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14454/6453
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2026
dc.subject.otherFeedback
dc.subject.otherRubric
dc.subject.otherSelf-efficacy
dc.subject.otherSelf-regulated learning
dc.subject.otherThink-aloud protocols
dc.titleHow rubric performance-level order and feedback shape students’ real-time self-regulation and self-efficacyen
dc.typejournal article
dcterms.accessRightsopen access
oaire.citation.issue1
oaire.citation.titleMetacognition and Learning
oaire.citation.volume21
oaire.licenseConditionhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
oaire.versionVoR
Archivos
Bloque original
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
panadero_how_2026.pdf
Tamaño:
3.32 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descargar
Colecciones
Artículos