Logotipo del repositorio
  • English
  • Español
  • Euskara
  • Iniciar sesión
    ¿Nuevo usuario? Regístrese aquí¿Ha olvidado su contraseña?
Logotipo del repositorio
  • DeustoTeka
  • Comunidades
  • Todo DSpace
  • Políticas
  • English
  • Español
  • Euskara
  • Iniciar sesión
    ¿Nuevo usuario? Regístrese aquí¿Ha olvidado su contraseña?
  1. Inicio
  2. Buscar por autor

Examinando por Autor "Llewellyn-Beardsley, Joy"

Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2
Resultados por página
Opciones de ordenación
  • Cargando...
    Miniatura
    Ítem
    Institutional injustice: implications for system transformation emerging from the mental health recovery narratives of people experiencing marginalisation
    (Public Library of Science, 2021-04-16) Hui, Ada; Rennick-Egglestone, Stefan; Franklin, Dona; Walcott, Rianna; Llewellyn-Beardsley, Joy; Ng, Fiona; Roe, James; Yeo, Caroline; Deakin, Emilia; Brydges, Sarah; Penas, Patricia; McGranahan, Rose; Pollock, Kristian; Thornicroft, Graham; Slade, Mike
    Background Institutional injustice refers to structures that create disparities in resources, opportunities and representation. Marginalised people experience institutional injustice, inequalities and discrimination through intersecting personal characteristics and social circumstances. This study aimed to investigate sources of institutional injustice and their effects on marginalised people with experience of mental health problems. Methods Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 77 individuals from marginalised groups with experience of mental health problems, including psychosis, Black, Asian and minority ethnic (BAME) populations, complex needs and lived experience as a work requirement. These were analysed inductively enabling sensitising concepts to emerge. Findings Three processes of institutional injustice were identified: not being believed because of social status and personal backgrounds; not being heard where narratives did not align with dominant discourses, and not being acknowledged where aspects of identity were disregarded. Harmful outcomes included disengagement from formal institutions through fear and mistrust, tensions and reduced affiliation with informal institutions when trying to consolidate new ways of being, and damaging impacts on mental health and wellbeing through multiple oppression. Conclusions Institutional injustice perpetuates health inequalities and marginalised status. Master status, arising from dominant discourses and heuristic bias, overshadow the narratives and experiences of marginalised people. Cultural competency has the potential to improve heuristic availability through social understandings of narrative and experience, whilst coproduction and narrative development through approaches such as communities of practice might offer meaningful avenues for authentic expression.
  • Cargando...
    Miniatura
    Ítem
    Recorded mental health recovery narratives as a resource for people affected by mental health problems: development of the narrative experiences online (NEON) intervention
    (JMIR Publications Inc., 2021-05-27) Slade, Mike; Rennick-Egglestone, Stefan; Llewellyn-Beardsley, Joy; Yeo, Caroline ; Roe, James; Bailey, Sylvia; Smith, Roger Andrew; Booth, Susie; Harrison, Julian; Bhogal, Adaresh; Penas, Patricia ; Hui, Ada ; Quadri, Dania; Robinson, Clare; Smuk, Melanie ; Farkas, Marianne; Davidson, Larry; van der Krieke, Lian; Slade, Emily; Bond, Carmel; Nicholson, Joe; Grundy, Andrew; Charles, Ashleigh; Hare-Duke, Laurie; Pollock, Kristian ; Ng, Fiona
    Background: The internet enables sharing of narratives about health concerns on a substantial scale, and some digital health narratives have been integrated into digital health interventions. Narratives describing recovery from health problems are a focus of research, including those presented in recorded (eg, invariant) form. No clinical trial has been conducted on a web-based intervention providing access to a collection of Recorded Recovery Narratives (RRNs). Objective: This study presents knowledge produced through the development of the Narrative Experiences Online (NEON) Intervention, a web-based intervention incorporating the algorithmic recommendation of RRNs. Methods: Knowledge was gathered through knowledge integration (KI) activities. KI1 synthesized previous studies to produce the NEON Impact Model describing how accessing RRNs produces health-related outcomes. KI2 developed curation principles for the NEON Collection of RRNs through consultation with the NEON Lived Experience Advisory Panel and the curation of a preliminary collection. KI3 identified harm minimization strategies for the NEON Intervention through consultation with the NEON International Advisory Board and Lived Experience Advisory Panel. The NEON Intervention was finalized through 2 research studies (RS). In RS1, mental health service users (N=40) rated the immediate impact of randomly presented narratives to validate narrative feedback questions used to inform the recommendation algorithm. In RS2, mental health service users (n=25) were interviewed about their immediate response to a prototype of the NEON Intervention and trial procedures and then were interviewed again after 1 month of use. The usability and acceptability of the prototype and trial procedures were evaluated and refinements were made. Results: KI1 produced the NEON Impact Model, which identifies moderators (recipient and context), mechanisms of connection (reflection, comparison, learning, and empathy), processes (identification of change from narrative structure or content and internalization of observed change), and outcomes (helpful and unhelpful). KI2 identified 22 curation principles, including a mission to build a large, heterogeneous collection to maximize opportunities for connection. KI3 identified seven harm minimization strategies, including content warnings, proactive and reactive blocking of narratives, and providing resources for the self-management of emotional distress. RS1 found variation in the impact of narratives on different participants, indicating that participant-level feedback on individual narratives is needed to inform a recommender system. The order of presentation did not predict narrative feedback. RS2 identified amendments to web-based trial procedures and the NEON Intervention. Participants accessed some narratives multiple times, use reduced over the 4-week period, and narrative feedback was provided for 31.8% (105/330) of narrative accesses. Conclusions: RRNs can be integrated into web-based interventions. Evaluating the NEON Intervention in a clinical trial is feasible. The mixed methods design for developing the NEON Intervention can guide its extension to other clinical populations, the design of other web-based mental health interventions, and the development of narrative-based interventions in mental health.
  • Icono ubicación Avda. Universidades 24
    48007 Bilbao
  • Icono ubicación+34 944 139 000
  • ContactoContacto
Rights

Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como:
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License

Software DSpace copyright © 2002-2025 LYRASIS

  • Configuración de cookies
  • Enviar sugerencias